How do GOP tariff policies affect New York State, especially Western NY?

The federal tariff policies have significant, outsized economic impacts across New York State, with Western New York (WNY) positioned squarely on the frontlines due to its geographical proximity to Canada, heavy cross-border commerce, and manufacturing base.

Broad New York State Impact

• Trade Deficits & Export Drops: Reciprocal tariffs hit New York’s top international markets. State exports to Canada declined by $3.8 billion, with nearly two-thirds of state export product categories seeing revenue losses.

• Higher Cost of Goods: Tariffs on raw imports (metals, foreign components, consumer goods) have created inflationary pressures, increasing average household costs across the state.

• Agricultural Stress: New York farmers face rising input costs for foreign machinery, equipment, and fertilizers alongside retaliatory trade measures. In response, NY State established a $30 million Tariff Relief Fund for affected agricultural producers.

Acutely Hit: Western New York (Buffalo / Niagara Region)

Western NY faces distinct vulnerabilities due to its integrated cross-border economy with Southern Ontario.

• Cross-Border Tourism Collapse: Increased border friction, political tension, and economic shifts led to a sharp drop in Canadian visitors across major bridge entry points (Peace Bridge, Rainbow Bridge, Lewiston-Queenston).

  • Regional travel from Canada fell over 21%, eliminating over 3.5 million cross-border visitors.

  • Hotel occupancy in Niagara Falls and Erie County saw steep drops in revenue, while local attractions, craft stores, and restaurants heavily reliant on Canadian day-trippers suffered significant sales drops.

• Manufacturing & Supply Chain Bottlenecks: Buffalo-Niagara’s industrial base relies on two-way supply chains across the border. Tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminum, paper, and industrial inputs significantly raised operating costs for regional print shops, machine parts suppliers, and auto components manufacturers.

• Agriculture & Agribusiness Delays: WNY fruit orchards, grape growers in the Finger Lakes, and dairy farms report uncertainty over equipment pricing and delayed capital investments.

Editor's note: While Western New York usually votes heavily Republican except of the large cities of Buffalo and Rochester, Republican policies have very negative consequences of Western New Yorkers especially cause by the GOP tariffs and anti-Canadian rhetoric. The latest GOP behavior with negative consequences is the suggestion that Lake Ontario be renamed Lake America.

With the negative consequences of GOP policies will Western New Yorkers continue to vote for Republicans to represent them at local, state, and federal levels of government?

Report on a play, The Children, by Lucy Kirkwood

The Children by Lucy Kirkwood, a play

I read Lucy Kirkwood’s 2016 play The Children about the aftermath of a Fukushima-like nuclear disaster in coastal England this past week, August 21-22/2026. I have gotten into reading plays in the last several months which are a different experience for me than reading novels and short stories. I like plays because the main content is dialogue without the other narrative description of circumstances surrounding the characters actions.

The Children has only three characters in their 60s who have been friends and colleagues most of their adult lives who have reunited after several years of separation at a cottage owned by Hazel and Robin a few miles up the coast from a nuclear generating facility which has exploded  at which they both, nuclear engineers,  built and worked several decades ago. An old friend, Rose, comes to visit with a special request that only becomes apparent as the visit progresses.

Spoiler alert.

What ensues is the plan that Rose has to go to the contaminated reactor and work to stabilize it exposing herself to toxic radiation so the young people there can leave. Rose needs 20 people to help her staff the project and she wants Hazel and Robin to join her team.

Rose’s plan raises many moral questions and quandaries:

The first is intergenerational responsibility and moral debt. What do older generations owe to those who follow. The characters—Hazel, Robin, and Rose—are retired nuclear engineers who helped design the flawed power plant. Rose’s arrival forces them to face a harrowing question: is it acceptable to let younger workers risk their health to clean up a mess created by their elders? The play argues that adulthood requires taking accountability for the systems we build and benefit from, rather than leaving the fallout for our descendants.

The second quandary is maintenance of domestic normalcy amid crisis Throughout the play, Hazel obsessively clings to routine—doing yoga, eating healthy, drinking tea—despite living just outside the exclusion zone on a decaying coastline. Kirkwood uses this to critique psychological denial. The play demonstrates how easily people distract themselves with minor, controllable habits to avoid confronting massive, existential disasters.

The third question is about sacrifice as a meaningful end to life. Rose proposes replacing the younger nuclear engineers at the plant because, as retirees, their remaining lifespan minimizes the long-term impact of radiation exposure. Through this choice, the narrative reframes aging and mortality. Sacrificing comfort or life expectancy in one's later years becomes an active, noble responsibility rather than a tragic loss, emphasizing that living meaningfully matters more than simply living long.

The fourth quandary is privilege and climate reality. The setting—a shrinking cottage threatened by rising sea levels and toxic waste—serves as a microcosm for global environmental collapse. The play highlights how post-war prosperity rested on consumption and technology without adequate consideration for long-term waste or ecological limits.

This play might be a great resource for a group discussion of the questions and quandaries and others described above.

If anyone would like to come to a onetime online discussion group for 90 minutes to discuss the ideas in this play with me, please send me an email at davidgmarkham@gmail.com.

Report on my reading of A World Appears so far.

In reading A World Appears by Michael Pollan I am up to page 84 out of 239 pages. I have covered the introduction, Chapter One on Sentience, and half way through Chapter Two on Feelings.

So far I have learned that “consciousness” can be broken down into four component parts: sentience, feelings, thoughts, and self.

Reading the first chapter on sentience I learned and was reminded that systems are self organizing and strive to maintain homeostasis as compared to entropy and dissolution. To maintain homeostasis systems must sense basic set points for their existence. This phenomenon can be seen in living organisms that must maintain energy levels and certain temperatures as well as boundaries of system interiors and exteriors or in mechanical devices such as a thermostat or other sort of energy regulator like a transformer.

Single cell organisms and living organisms such as plants are self regulating both as individuals and as collectives with other  interdependent entities in ecological systems. While these entities are self regulating to decrease uncertainty about the circumstances of their survival (maintenance of homeostasis) they may not be consciously aware of this activity as humans and other mammals can be.

What are the implications of this understanding of sentience as a primitive form of consciousness? It may engender and enhance a reverence and gratitude for the interdependence of all parts of existence. This panpsychism is part of many Earth-centered spiritual traditions which recognize and celebrate the sacred circle of life and instruct us to be aware of and  live in harmony with the rhythms of nature.

Lack of thinking time contributes to lack of understanding of complex topics.

I

n 2024, in a national test, just 35 percent of high-school seniors were “proficient” at skills such as analyzing complex fictional themes and evaluating the effectiveness of an author’s argument. About the same number scored below “basic,” meaning that they may struggle to draw conclusions from concepts explicitly included in a text, or to use context clues to determine the meaning of an unknown word. Adult-literacy scores have also dropped: Nearly 30 percent of American adults cannot paraphrase or make inferences from a multipage text. In 2017, that number was less than 20 percent.

Rose Horowatch, The Age Of Reading is Over, The Atlantic, August 2026

The finding that one out of three American Adults cannot paraphrase or make inferences from a multipage text tells us something about the rise of MAGA with its conspiracy theories and ignorance of the truth. This lack of ability to think about complex subjects puts democracy in jeopardy and makes support of con men and charismatic authoritarians possible.

Schools banning smart phones during the school day seems to be a step in the right direction freeing students from distractions and giving them more time to think. Are there other ways our society could encourage more thinking time for its citizens?

Editor's note:

This is the second of a series of articles on reading.

How to change the US healthcare system: some thoughts.

how to change the health care system in the US. Here are some of the ideas I have thought of:

Keep your first efforts local. What is happening in your immediate community? How is your practice or agency or organization managed? What are it's values? What is the quality of care being offered? How accessible is it for all community members?

As Social Workers we are especially skilled, hopefully, in helping people navigate the local service system. Where are the cracks in the system? We Social Workers have been taught how to do "case" and "class" advocacy which leads to the question of what are the skills and activities of advocacy at both the case and the class levels?

I have found that people increasingly are opting out of the commercial system and have gone without care or explored resources that are "off-grid." I, myself, practice what I preach and have become very skeptical about participating in what constiutes current practices which Cory Doctorow has called "enshitification."

Also, I notice that boycotts have occured by various unions of health care workers and in some cases institutions who have dropped off of panels and refused to cooperate with various health care insurers.

In the extreme, some resistance and objections to the current health system has become violent as in the case of Louis Mangione killed United Healthcare excutive Brian Thompson in December of 2024 in NYC.

I don't support violence or condone it but I do understand the dynamics contributing to such violent behavior. I favor "bypass" as a strategy because I don't think the current health care system can be changed. We have to create and implement alternative systems which we have had in the past through nonprofit organizations often staffed by religious organizations, and govenmental entities such as the VA and City and County hospitals paid for my tax and charitable dollars.

What ideas does anyone have about creating and implementing alternative nonprofit service health care systems?

Does not reading books make Americans more illiterate?

 From The Atlantic, August 2026, The End Of Reading Is Over, by Rose Horowatch.

Americans, once members of a proudly literate society, read much less than they used to. According to the National Endowment for the Arts, which conducts the most comprehensive survey of the nation’s reading habits, fewer than half of all adults reported having read a book of any kind in 2022. Only 38 percent read a novel or short story. A study analyzing 236,000 responses to the American Time Use Survey found that the proportion of Americans who read for pleasure on any given day fell from 28 percent in 2004 to 16 percent in 2023. (The study looked at people who had read a book, magazine, or newspaper; listened to an audiobook; or read an e-book.) Gambling has become a more common leisure activity than reading a book: Last year, 57 percent of Americans placed a bet.

What does it mean that the majority of Americans don't read books for pleasure? Are Americans increasingly becoming illiterate distracted by sound bites and sensationalized headlines to attact their attention? What does this phenomenon mean for the future of democracy?

When a society shifts from widespread long-form reading to a state where only a small minority regularly engages with books, the consequences ripple across cultural, political, economic, and psychological domains. Data from the American Time Use Survey and recent studies out of the University of Florida and University College London confirm that daily reading for pleasure has dropped to roughly 16% of the population.

While digital media provides a constant stream of "textual fragments"—captions, news bites, and social posts—the loss of sustained, deep reading alters how a society processes information and relates to one another.

Have you read a book in the last year? Are reading a book now? Do prefer fiction or nonfiction? If you read books, what's the best book you have read in the last five years and what made it the best for you?

GOP policies makes American health care system even worse.

 From Public Health Watch, 08/01/26

Recent federal policy changes will stress U.S. hospital and health systems, making it harder for them to provide care, a new Urban Institute report predicts.

New limits on Medicaid financing, work requirements for Medicaid users, the end of health insurance tax credits and other recent health-related policies put into place by Congress and the Trump administration will have a negative impact across the country, according to the July 29 report.

Together, the policies are expected to increase the number of uninsured people, reduce hospital revenue and overburden the healthcare workforce. Financial strain could force some hospitals to reduce services, cut staff or close, especially in already struggling rural and low-income communities. As of 2025, about 40% of hospitals were already operating with negative margins, the report noted.

Growing numbers of uninsured and underinsured patients are expected to increase uncompensated care, leaving hospitals with more unpaid bills. An additional 5.3 million people are expected to become uninsured under the new Medicaid work requirements alone, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office.

New limits on state Medicaid financing could also reduce payments to hospitals, making it harder for them to stay financially stable. Safety net, rural, academic and children's hospitals are expected to face greater financial challenges because of their reliance on Medicaid funding.

Changes to immigration policies also are expected to worsen existing workforce shortages by making it harder to recruit and retain healthcare staff. Foreign-born workers accounted for 18% of the U.S. healthcare workforce and 27% of hospital physicians in 2023. New Trump administration restrictions on who can enter and stay in the U.S. are expected to squeeze the workforce supply.

Lowest quality of life states in America are Republican governed

 From Jess Piper on 07/23/26

I just found out that I live in one of the worst ranked states in the country.

Well, I already knew that instinctively, but my thoughts were confirmed when I came across a CNBC study of the worst ranked states in the country. Here is the ranking:

Tennessee
Texas
Indiana
Louisiana
Georgia
Utah
Missouri
Alabama
Oklahoma
Arkansas

States ranked at the bottom of the list were penalized for high crime rates, low health care access, a lack of livable wage policies, a lack of worker protections, and laws that restrict civil and reproductive rights.

......................

I bet you noticed something else immediately, though. Each of the states listed is dominated by the Republican Party. They all have a GOP-dominated government and many of the states listed, like mine, have had a GOP supermajority for decades and also have a Republican trifecta holding the Governor’s office and the Statehouse and State Senate.

This is where I state the obvious: Republicans can’t govern. And they don’t want to. It was never about governance. It was always about consolidating power.

For more click here.

Standard time is much better than Daylight Savings Time if the US is to stabilize its clock.

From the Local Epidemiologist on 07/22/26

Congress has gotten as far as it ever has in ending twice-a-year clock changes. The House passed the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make daylight saving time (DST) permanent. It now heads to the Senate. If that passes, your mornings will stay darker for longer. But if it doesn’t go through, another bill is coming right behind it that would stabilize clock time in the opposite direction, enacting permanent standard time.

Ending the clock switch is extremely popular, and science agrees stopping this madness is what’s best for our health. But nearly every major sleep-medicine and circadian-biology organization recommends permanent standard time, not permanent daylight saving time (DST), which the House just approved.

The science about why the direction of the clock switch matters starts with your body.

For more click here.

The proposal coming from the US House of Representatives to make Daylight Savings Time permanent and people in the US would no longer be changing their clocks twice per year is bad for the nation's health and is not based on science.

To do away with the time changes is a good idea and seems to be popular with the American people, but it would be better if the permanent time change was to Standard Time not Daylight Savings Time based on the circadian rythms of homo sapiens.

If you can't win fair and square: cheat

From The Conversation on July 17, 2026

 US President Donald Trump has used a rare nationwide prime-time address to again claim the 2020 presidential election was stolen, US voting machines cannot be trusted, and a “deep state” conspiracy has covered it all up.

However, the declassified documents the White House released alongside the speech do not support those claims.

As such, Trump’s speech may matter less for what it says about the 2020 election than what it portends for November’s Congressional midterm elections, which could result in huge losses for his Republican Party.

Critics say Trump is clearly setting the stage to delegitimise the vote, so he can contest the result if it doesn’t go his way.

For more click here

Will you affirm and promote the right of conscience and the use of democratic processes in the US? Will you pledge to tell the truth and to be fair in your interactions with others?